Well, there has been, as I said, there have been rumors, I think there was someone who had tweeted yesterday, a person of public, a public person that, you know, I hear unverified rumor the grand jury is going to have their decision by Friday. I don't know where they get this stuff. I don't know where that comes from, but I know that last week and yesterday Mr. McCulloch did give interviews to the media.
Last week he gave interviews to several media outlets describing the process. The fact how a grand jury is selected, you know.
My office has nothing to do with how you all are selected. The fact that you were selected way before this even, you know, happened, you know. And then the process of how, you know, when you have regular lives, this is not like a jury in a trial where Monday through Friday from 8:00 to 5:00 you are going to be here until it is done. That's not how it works. In a trial that's how it work, I mean.
We have jurors that we have to tell them in advance this is going to be a two-week trial, this is going to be a three-week trial. But he has made those statements and, you know, I can't, I can't help what goes around in the rumor mill. I don't think we have much control over that.
But I will express to him those thoughts that if any wisdom in trying to bring together some of the people in the various communities who can disseminate that message that, you know, be patient.
I mean, there is that catch phrase people always talk about, rush to judgment. That was a phrase made popular years ago. People keep saying hurry up, hurry up. We're not going to rush to judgment here.
If we wanted to, we could present this case as we do any other case. We could have a detective come in here and tell you what he thinks, you know, the evidence is, and then you all would be making your own decision based on that, but that's not how we've chosen to do this because of the importance of letting all sides be heard in this matter.
So I will talk to Mr. McCulloch about the strategy behind that, that it might be, because we all want everybody to just calm down. It will happen, there will be an answer, but you have to be patient, you have to let the grand jury do their job, you have to let us do our job.
And, you know, the problem is too, we can't tell people how often you're meeting, what days you're meeting, how many witnesses are testifying, because we're prohibited from talking about that.
And so when people ask questions how often are they meeting or how many hours a week or how many witnesses are they hearing from, we can't answer those questions.
I think just the fact that the questions are asked and we can't answer it, I wonder if that might create even more like, well, why aren't you telling us this.
So I will talk to him and maybe we'll kick that around and we meet daily, except for these days. We usually don't meet on these days, but we meet pretty much every day and talk about what's going on and how we are progressing.
And so yes,
I'm going to piggyback on her question. I've heard a lot of people talking about, this is people who should know, talking about why don't they just arrest him, and then figure out what's going on, why don't they just take action, do they not understand the process? Is that the problem, or is there a way to bypass this because it seems to me that we're doing what needs to be done and we're doing what's right and people are not seeing that.